All time that we, Brazilians, come across in them with a crime of bigger commotion, pricipalmente those with requintes of cruelty, urges a outcry for the death penalty. But it is necessary caution in the analysis of the practical one of this capital punishment. It is clearly that when the society is stimulated, nails the execution of passional form of that they had supposedly committed a barbarous crime. This, in fact, generates a revenge feeling and brightens up the pain of the loss of those that had been brutally assassinated. However, to brighten up pain does not mean to finish completely with it.
It is at least incoherent? we can there extender to the philosophical field – that the man, to reach the well biggest one, who is the life, kills for justice. He is difficult to imagine that the State says the citizen that it cannot kill, but if this to happen, it, the State, goes to kill it. A balanced country cannot think about death penalty when the abortion and the autansia are rejected. We dislike any attempted against against the life, but we can authorize the State to attempt against against the life of somebody punishment heading? This logic never will be true. Therefore, what if he waits of a penalty is that the convict has left recouped it and that its return to the society is of worthy form. We cannot have the pretension to shorten the life of nobody, exactly of that in some way they had taken off other lives. The penalty of these monsters will have to be paid while still alive and not with the death. Andres Lopes Fialho