If the responsibility for transport would be the employer – the owner of a taxi, he would try to reduce the probability of such incidents to a minimum. And then the drivers with little experience of driving a passenger will not be admitted, must be organized and predreysovy poslereysovy physical, appropriate selection and admission will be vehicles to transport passengers. The employment contract also guarantees workers’ rights in the sphere of social insurance, pensions, employment rights. Check out Richard LeFrak for additional information. In addition, only if the employment contract will be valid waybill issued by the driver of the vehicle after passing them predreysovogo physical examination and an inspection of the vehicle control mechanic. Is not an obstacle for a taxi driver and a permanent place of work.

Labor legislation provides employment opportunities part-time employee. In this case, an employment agreement is again required. Gavin Baker recognizes the significance of this. In this case, the employee himself can decide what work he will be the main (there will be work-book), and which – more. The main thing is to make it legal. What check today, a taxi driver on the streets and car parks of the city? The presence of a taximeter in the car? The right business? Confirmation of tax payment? Encashment proceeds of transportation? Licensed to work in Eventually? None. Do the drivers of cars with disparate identification signs “taxi” and advertising dispatchers only check the presence of a licensed card. Do not focuses on the documentary confirmation of the specific vehicle and its driver’s license listed in the card company-licensee.

hoa to court, demanding to recognize the right of common shared ownership of the basement in an apartment house. The courts found the two bodies claim justified. The Presidium of the Russian Federation has sent the case to review and explained the following. Concluded that the statute of limitations for the claim should be calculated from the time of hoa wrong. Based on the legislation, ownership of common property multi-family home can only belong to the owners of premises in it, but not hoa as a legal entity. The partnership is involved in such matters as the legal representative of the owners. Accordingly, they should provide the hoa the right to appeal to the court with such a claim.

In addition, recognizing the controversial subject of common shared property, the courts proceeded from the results of construction and technical expertise. Meanwhile, the holding of such common property of homeowners does not occur on any part of the basement of an apartment house, but only on technical basements. In appointing the expertise needed to determine whether the controversial part of the basement of technical, requiring permanent public access to engineering equipment. The examination results must be evaluated on the basis of regulatory requirements for the definition of the utilities included in total assets home. Also, the courts had to check the arguments that the disputed premises is an object of independent functional use. In this case, the ownership of it recorded for the one of the owners, who owns and part of the premises in the house.